{"id":376,"date":"2010-10-03T22:42:53","date_gmt":"2010-10-04T05:42:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fiduciarydutiesblog.com\/?p=376"},"modified":"2010-10-03T22:42:53","modified_gmt":"2010-10-04T05:42:53","slug":"safe-deposit-boxes-are-not-as-safe-as-they-seem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/?p=376","title":{"rendered":"Safe Deposit Boxes Are Not as Safe as They Seem"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Conventional wisdom is that a safe deposit box is a safe place to  store valuable belongings.\u00a0 And that\u2019s true, as long as the owner keeps  track of the contents of the safe deposit box.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, I have handled a case in which a bank denied, in writing, the  existence of a safe deposit box in the decedent\u2019s name.\u00a0 A few months  later, when presented with the key to the safe deposit box, the bank  \u201cfound\u201d the box and we recovered thousands of dollars in U.S. government  bonds.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiff in <strong>Gabriel v. Wells Fargo Bank<\/strong> (Aug. 30, 2010) 2010 DJDAR 14579 did not fare as well.\u00a0 In <strong>Gabriel v. Wells Fargo Ban<\/strong>k,  the decedent held a safe deposit box.\u00a0 The widow learned of the safe  deposit box 16 years after her husband\u2019s death.\u00a0 In the box was a  non-negotiable certificate of deposit in the face amount of $976,691.60,  payable to the widow.<\/p>\n<p><strong>But because the widow could not prove a negative<\/strong> (specifically, because she could not prove that Wells Fargo Bank had not already paid out on the certificate of deposit), <strong>she lost at the trial court and on appeal<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s a bitter pill, and a strange decision.\u00a0 Here are the facts and the holding.<br \/>\n\u201cOn June 22, 1988, Hideo purchased a certificate of deposit from Wells  Fargo in the amount of $976,691.60, payable to his wife Kuniko.\u00a0  Interest from the certificate was to be placed in a savings account held  in Kuniko&#8217;s name.\u00a0 Hideo apparently placed a receipt from the bank for  the certificate of deposit account in a safe deposit box at the bank  which was also in Kuniko&#8217;s name.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sounds like great facts.\u00a0 \u201cHideo died in November 1991 . . . In April  2002, Wells Fargo opened the safe deposit box because the rental fee  had not been paid and the box was presumed abandoned.\u00a0 It found the  certificate of deposit and in June 2006 sent it to the California  Controller&#8217;s Office as unclaimed property.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Still going strong.\u00a0 \u201cIn August 2007, Kuniko received a letter from  the controller&#8217;s office informing her that it was holding the contents  of a safe deposit box from Wells Fargo. The controller sent her the  contents of the box, which included the receipt for the certificate of  deposit. This was the first time that she learned of the existence of  the certificate of deposit or of the savings account . . . Kuniko sued  Wells Fargo, claiming that it failed to pay her the money in the  accounts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>What more do you need?\u00a0 A lot, according to the court.\u00a0 \u201cThe court  granted summary judgment in favor of the bank, finding that despite the  absence of definitive records, Wells Fargo had presented sufficient  evidence of its normal business practices to establish that no funds  remained in either account.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Are you wondering what went wrong?\u00a0 You should be.\u00a0\u00a0 Here\u2019s how Wells  Fargo got away scot-free.\u00a0 \u201cWells Fargo has no records indicating that  any funds from the CD account or the savings account were ever  transferred to the State Controller&#8217;s Office as unclaimed property.\u00a0 If  any unclaimed funds remained in either of these accounts, those funds  would have been escheated to the State Controller&#8217;s Office and Wells  Fargo would have records of that fact.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>OK, so the bank did not pay out the funds to the state as unclaimed  property.\u00a0 What happened to the million dollars, which was payable to  the widow?\u00a0 \u201cWells Fargo [determined] that neither account was open, and  that no records existed which would show when those accounts had been  closed or how much money had been in the account when they were open.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.krbecheklaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/10\/Reunification-Express.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" title=\"Fresno lawyers\" src=\"http:\/\/www.krbecheklaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/10\/Reunification-Express.jpg\" alt=\"Reunification Express\" width=\"640\" height=\"427\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Watch the train wreck unfold before your eyes.\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cWells Fargo&#8217;s  evidence establishes that the absence of specific Wells Fargo records  infers that the certificate of deposit was withdrawn.\u00a0\u00a0 Since there is  no evidence that plaintiff Yamamoto&#8217;s late husband did not withdraw the  funds, and no evidence that the terms of the certificate of deposit  account did not permit him to withdraw the funds, plaintiff Yamamoto is  unable to meet her burden of producing evidence on an essential element  of her claim.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Really?\u00a0 The widow loses?\u00a0 Said the court, \u201c<strong>At trial Kuniko would have the burden of proving nonpayment.<\/strong>\u201d\u00a0 Well. The widow said she never received the money.\u00a0 Isn\u2019t that enough?<\/p>\n<p>No way, said the court.\u00a0 \u201cWells Fargo submitted the declaration of  the operations manager of the bank&#8217;s unclaimed property department who  is responsible for monitoring dormant accounts and reporting escheated  property to the State Controller&#8217;s Office.\u00a0 Her declaration states that  \u2018it is Wells Fargo&#8217;s policy and practice to maintain account records for  seven years after the account has been closed.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>No tickee, no laundry.\u00a0 Or, because the bank has no records, the  widow loses.\u00a0 \u201cWells Fargo&#8217;s evidence that no money remained in the  accounts shifted to Kuniko the burden of presenting evidence sufficient  to create a triable issue as to nonpayment, and her possession of the  receipt and her testimony were insufficient to do so.\u00a0 The trial court  therefore properly granted summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The moral of this story \u2013 make sure that your family knows how to  find your valuable possessions.\u00a0 Also, bankers have a powerful lobby,  and the laws favor them to an unreasonable degree.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gabriel v. Wells Fargo Bank<\/strong> (Aug. 30, 2010) 2010 DJDAR 14579<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conventional wisdom is that a safe deposit box is a safe place to store valuable belongings.\u00a0 And that\u2019s true, as long as the owner keeps track of the contents of the safe deposit box. Yet, I have handled a case in which a bank denied, in writing, the existence of a safe deposit box in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-case-law","category-trusts-and-estates"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=376"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}