{"id":735,"date":"2011-08-30T14:53:22","date_gmt":"2011-08-30T14:53:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.krbecheklaw.com\/?p=735"},"modified":"2011-08-30T14:53:22","modified_gmt":"2011-08-30T14:53:22","slug":"paul-ronald-vs-bank-of-america-court-closes-door-on-another-exotic-theory-of-mortgage-liability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/?p=735","title":{"rendered":"Paul Ronald vs. Bank of America &#8211; Court Closes Door on Another Exotic Theory of Mortgage Liability"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The trend in the courts has been to reduce the legal theories available to persons who suffered losses during the mortgage meltdown.\u00a0 Traditional theories based on breach of contract, fraud, and promissory estoppel, remain viable causes of action.<\/p>\n<p>Yet the more exotic theories seeking to impose liability have been narrowed and often eliminated.\u00a0 Such is the case in <strong>Bank of America v. Superior Court (Paul Ronald)<\/strong> (August 25, 2011) 2011 DJDAR 12942.\u00a0 In the Paul Ronald action, the plaintiff sought to hold Bank of America, as successor-in-interest to Countrywide Mortgage, liable for the general decline in property values triggered by Countrywide\u2019s bad lending practices.\u00a0 The court would have none of it.<\/p>\n<p>According to the complaint, \u201cCountrywide&#8217;s founder and CEO, Angelo Mozilo determined that Countrywide could not sustain its business \u2018unless it used its size and large market share in California to systematically create false and inflated property appraisals throughout California.\u00a0 Countrywide then used these false property valuations to induce Plaintiffs and other borrowers into ever-larger loans on increasingly risky terms.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>The complaint continued.\u00a0 \u201cMozilo knew \u2018these loans were unsustainable for Countrywide and the borrowers and to a certainty would result in a crash that would destroy the equity invested by Plaintiffs and other Countrywide borrowers.\u00a0 Mozilo and others at Countrywide \u2018hatched a plan to &#8216;pool&#8217; the foregoing mortgages and sell the pools for inflated value.\u00a0 Rapidly, these two intertwined schemes grew into a brazen plan to disregard underwriting standards and fraudulently inflate property values.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, those allegations describe the general problems that swept through the mortgage industry.\u00a0 \u201cThis writ petition relates solely to plaintiffs&#8217; cause of action for fraudulent concealment.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The trial judge noted the scope of the issue presented to it.\u00a0 On January 11, 2011, the matter came on for hearing.\u00a0 At the outset, the trial court indicated, \u201cthe issues presented by the many plaintiffs in this case as against their current mortgage lender and\/or loan servicer are part of a larger socioeconomic problem that confronts our society in California and all of the other states in this union, an issue of great concern to the U.S. Congress, state Legislature, and the bank regulators, given that in our banking system the banks are insured by the full faith and credit of the United States government for all intents and purposes, so the continued solvency of the banking industry as a whole is a matter of intense interest to the U.S. Congress as well as the central bank.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s the real problem.\u00a0 This is not a matter that should be dumped into a trail court.\u00a0 Our entire justice system has shrugged its shoulders and refused to impose liability on anyone for the manipulations that developed into the mortgage crisis.\u00a0 Shame on us.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.krbecheklaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Destin-Fla..jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-736 aligncenter\" title=\"Fresno real estate lawyers\" src=\"http:\/\/www.krbecheklaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Destin-Fla..jpg\" alt=\"Destin, Fla.\" width=\"500\" height=\"333\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>It seems there are some 20 cases rolling around in Los Angeles and Orange Counties based on the same charging allegations.\u00a0 As explained by the court of appeal, \u201cWe conclude the plaintiffs\/borrowers cannot state a cause of action against Countrywide for fraudulent concealment of an alleged scheme to bilk investors by selling them pooled mortgages at inflated values, the demise of which scheme led to devastated home values across California.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Explained the court, \u201cwe conclude that while Countrywide had a duty to refrain from committing fraud, it had no independent duty to disclose to its borrowers its alleged intent to defraud its investors by selling them mortgage pools at inflated values.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>More specifically, \u201cDue to the generalized decline in home values which affects all homeowners (borrowers of Countrywide, borrowers who dealt with other lenders, and homeowners who owned their homes free and clear), there is no nexus between Countrywide&#8217;s alleged fraudulent concealment of its scheme to bilk investors and the diminution in value of the instant borrowers&#8217; properties.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Further, the court noted that the complaint embraced a general decline in property values across the state.\u00a0 \u201cIrrespective of whether a homeowner obtained a loan from Countrywide, or obtained a loan through another lender, or whether a homeowner owned his or her home free and clear, all suffered a loss of home equity due to the generalized decline in home values.\u00a0 That being the case, there is no nexus between the alleged fraudulent concealment by Countrywide and the economic harm which these plaintiffs\/borrowers have suffered.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The final holding \u2013 \u201cWe merely conclude plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action against Countrywide for fraudulent concealment of its alleged scheme to bilk investors by selling collateralized mortgage pools at an inflated value, the demise of which led to a generalized decline in California residential property values.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This writer is as upset about the mortgage debacle, and the refusal of governmental authorities to take action, as anyone else.\u00a0 But the right place for action is the Department of Justice, or the Securities and Exchange Commission, not a trial court.<\/p>\n<p>Most commendable is the speed at which the court issued this decision.\u00a0 The lawsuit was filed in March 2009.\u00a0 The trial court issued its order dismissing the claim for fraudulent concealment on January 11, 2011.\u00a0 This writ proceeding was resolved by decision entered on August 25, 2011.\u00a0 Justice is not always delayed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bank of America v. Superior Court (Paul Ronald)<\/strong> (August 25, 2011) 2011 DJDAR 12942<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The trend in the courts has been to reduce the legal theories available to persons who suffered losses during the mortgage meltdown.\u00a0 Traditional theories based on breach of contract, fraud, and promissory estoppel, remain viable causes of action. Yet the more exotic theories seeking to impose liability have been narrowed and often eliminated.\u00a0 Such is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-case-law","category-real-property"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/735"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=735"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/735\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fresnolawyerblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}